February 2007

Download Print Send a summary of this page to someone via email.
| Next
 

Who

In The Pink Leisure Ltd and Eclipse Developments Ltd

When

28 Feb 2007

Where

Blackpool Magistrates Court

Why

In The Pink Leisure Ltd of 44 Queen St, Blackpool were fined £10,000 and ordered to pay £4,753 costs after pleading guilty to a breach of Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act which requires them to protect the safety of persons not in their employment.  Their contactor Eclipse Developments Ltd of Chapel St, Poulton le Fylde were fined £15,000 and ordered to pay £6,535 costs after pleading guilty of a breach of Section 2(1) of the same act which requires them to protect the safety of their own employees.  The cases arose from an HSE visit - made in April 2005 following a complaint - to the site of a new night club in the upstairs of the former Odeon Cinema in Dickson Road, Blackpool above the existing Funny Girls Nightclub, operated by In The Pink Leisure Ltd.  HSE lead construction inspector for Lancashire Mark Cottriall says: "A substantial amount of asbestos insulating board and flock asbestos was disturbed while the refurbishment was being carried out in the upper circle, leading to the construction site being closed for a number of weeks while a licensed asbestos contractor was called in to carry out an environmental clean and the removal of the remaining asbestos.  Both companies had had previous advice in relation to asbestos on the site following a visit from HSE in January 2002, when a full survey was carried out and an amount of asbestos removed.  Unfortunately nobody had referred back to the existing survey which identified asbestos being present in the upper circle. The prosecution was taken because of this failure and the consequent exposure of up to a dozen employees working in the construction being exposed to asbestos containing materials.  Following checks we were able to confirm there was no contamination of Funny Girls night club."

How Much?

£25,000 plus costs across the 2 parties


Who

Michael Allinson and Lakeland Property Consultants and Management Ltd

When

22 Feb 2007

Where

Barnsley Magistrates Court

Why

Michael Allinson of Halton Moor Road, Leeds, and Lakeland Property Consultants and Management Co. Ltd. of Dewsbury Road, Cleckheaton were each fined £1,500 plus costs of £315 each. Michael Allinson pleaded guilty to a charge under Regulation 6(3) of The Work at Height Regulations 2005 for failing to take suitable and sufficient measures to prevent workers falling a distance liable to cause personal injury prior to work starting at the site.  Lakeland Property Consultants and Management Company Ltd, who were the client for the work, pleaded guilty to a charge under Regulation 10 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 1994 for failing to ensure a health and safety plan was in place that took account of all the risks involved in the construction work such as work at height prior to work starting on site.  HSE inspector John Rowe found Michael Allinson and his two employees risking serious injury as they dismantled a roof whilst standing on top of it at the former Polar Garage in Wombwell Lane, Barnsley, with no form of edge or other protection to prevent them falling either through the fragile roofing sheets and roof lights from the edge created internally by the removal of roofing sheets, or from the edge of the building, on to an area of hard standing almost twelve metres below.  John Rowe said: "Working in this way is sheer folly. There are straightforward precautions that are widely accepted by the construction industry when doing work of this nature such as using a platform to work from beneath the fragile roof.  Unfortunately there had been no planning as to how the work was to progress and these roofers were relying entirely on the thin steel beams beneath the sheets to bear their weight as they moved across the roof - they had to walk along the line of bolts they could see in the roof sheets. One false step either side of the bolts could have been fatal. This unacceptable situation was compounded because there was nothing to stop anyone falling from the edge of the building or from the edge created internally by the removal of roofing sheets."

How Much?

£3,000 plus costs across the 2 parties


Who

HBR (North) Ltd

When

22 Feb 2007

Where

York Magistrates Court

Why

HBR (North) Ltd of Dunnington, York pleaded guilty in York Magistrates' Court to a charges under Section 3 (2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, and Regulation 6(3) of the Work at Height Regulations 2005, for failing to prevent the fall of a contractor through a large opening in the floor left by the removal of a dust extractor.  The contractor, who worked for AMG Ltd, was installing a compressor when he fell through the hole to the floor two metres below, pulling the equipment weighing 120 kg on top of him. As a result he fractured his pelvis and spine in several places, was hospitalised for a number of weeks and remains in pain and unable to work.  HSE Inspector Andrea Lowe, who investigated the case, says:  "This was an incident with very serious consequences, but what makes it even more tragic is the fact that it could have been so easily avoided with some forethought and planning. The company failed to plan or supervise the work, and did not consider maintenance and the risks that would be involved in future work at height. It is a basic requirement, when looking at any such project, to 'plan to avoid' such work - in this case, for example, they should have considered the viability of siting the compressor at ground floor level. The company has now covered the hole in the floor, but unfortunately it has taken a life-threatening event to bring about a common-sense decision."   Falls from height are the most common cause of fatal injury and the second most common cause of major injury to employees, accounting for around 15% of all such injuries.

How Much?

£10,000 plus costs


Who

Southern Cross Healthcare

When

16 Feb 2007

Where

Stafford Crown Court

Why

The case was brought by the HSE follows its investigation into the death of a 69 year old resident, who suffocated in her bed at Hornegarth nursing home on 15 April 2005 after becoming trapped by the legs in a gap between one of the bedrails on her bed and the beds mattress.  Speaking after the case, HSE investigating inspector Andrew Bowker said:  "The death of Margaret O'Mara was the tragic result of a failure by Hornegarth nursing home to follow its own quality procedures relating to the safe use of bedrails. There was a catalogue of errors at the home that resulted in Margaret being exposed to unnecessary risk. Her room had both incorrectly fitted bedrails and an incorrectly fitted pressure mattress. The care staff who were required to fit this equipment had not been trained on how to do the job properly and had no access to instructions. Risk assessment documentation specifically designed to guide staff through the safe use of this equipment was not being used at the site."  Margaret O'Mara from Great Wyrley, Cannock, suffocated when she became trapped in a gap between one of the bedrails on her bed and the bed mattress. She had very limited upper body movement and could not free herself from a face down position once her legs were trapped. The accident happened at Hornegarth nursing home, Great Wyrley, Cannock.  Southern Cross Health Care Group PLC, from Darlington, County Durham, which owns Hornegarth nursing home, pleaded guilty to a breach of section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974; and guilty to a breach of Regulation 3(1) of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.

How Much?

£175,000 plus costs


Who

Enviro-Waste Ltd

When

15 Feb 2007

Where

Norwich Crown Court

Why

The prosecution was brought by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) following the deaths of three employees in Thetford, Norfolk, in July 2004, when the men became trapped in a slurry holding tank during their work.   Eddie Scoggins, HSE Principal Inspector, said:  "These three deaths should make clear to all, the extremely dangerous nature of the work in confined spaces. There have now been seven deaths from confined spaces incidents in the East of England since 2003. If any proof was needed, this shows that any work in confined spaces is extremely hazardous.“  Enviro-Waste Ltd, of Brunel Way, Thetford, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (HSW Act) was fined £72,500 and ordered to pay costs of £50,000.  The company's director, Roger Arthur Clark, and its general manager, Gordon John Betts, both pleaded guilty to breaching Section 37(1) of the HSW Act and were each fined £10,000.

How Much?

£72,000 plus costs


Who

Shabir Naseem t/a SH Builders

When

15 Feb 2007

Where

Calderdale Magistrates Court

Why

A builder has been sentenced to 200 hours community service, together with a fine of £7,500 and costs of £7,190.58, for breaching a Prohibition Notice which ordered him to stop him work on a site in Elland where a building under development later collapsed.  Shabir Naseem (trading as SH Builders) of Fartown, Huddersfield, pleaded guilty at Calderdale Magistrates' Court to charges of breaching the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (the HSW Act) brought by HSE. Despite the Prohibition Notice, Mr Naseem continued to manage construction work without the necessary knowledge, qualifications and understanding of health and safety law and did so in such a manner as to cause a partial collapse of the former Sunset amusement arcade at the junction of Timber Street and Southgate, Elland, West Yorkshire.

How Much?

£7,500 plus costs


Who

Derby City Council

When

9 Feb 2007

Where

Derby Crown Court

Why

The HSE is urging local authorities to review how they maintain their railings and fences, following the death of 12 year-old Vicky Thomas.  Vicky died after a section of fence at Osmaston Park in Derby collapsed on 12 May 2003.  HSE successfully prosecuted Derby City Council, who today (9 February) pleaded guilty to breaching S3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act by not ensuring that the railings were maintained. They were fined £42,000 and ordered to pay costs of £58,000 at Derby Crown Court.

How Much?

£42,000 plus costs


Who

William Hargreaves Ltd

When

8 Feb 2007

Where

Hyndburn Magistrates Court

Why

Wigan construction company William Hargreaves Ltd was fined £1,500 and ordered to pay £1,774 costs after pleading guilty to a criminal charge brought by the HSE. The case was heart at Hyndburn Magistrates' Court after a 15-year-old work experience boy fell approximately 3m from scaffolding above a loading bay.  John Ferguson - known as Kilpatrick - then 15 and a pupil of St Bede's RC High School in Blackburn was spending two weeks working with bricklayers at Hargreaves' Clearwater Village housing development in Marsh House Lane in Darwen, Lancashire when he fell on 13 July 2004.  Following the accident he was taken to Blackburn Royal Infirmary Hospital. He suffered a brain haemorrhage, hurt his spine, had bruises and concussion.  HSE inspector Joanne Eccles who took the case says: "Falls from height are one of the commonest causes of injury in construction work, yet with proper protective measures, they are easily preventable. In this case the loading bay was protected by a single guardrail that was not secured. Loading bay gates should have been fitted.  Hargreaves Ltd completed risk assessments relating to prevention of falls and erection of scaffolds and a young person's risk assessment was carried out, but they had not been forwarded to the site manager who was unaware of John's presence on site so he was not inducted into health and safety procedures.  He was working among a team of five, assisting bricklayers with carrying of bricks, moving mortar and generally helping them. He was working on scaffold throughout this time."  William Hargreaves Ltd of Swift House on the Bradley Hall Estate at Standish in Wigan breached Regulation 6(1) of the Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996 by failing to take suitable and sufficient steps to prevent, so far as is reasonably practicable, persons from falling.

How Much?

£1,500 plus costs


Who

LCL Electronics Ltd

When

6 Feb 2007

Where

Loughborough Magistrates Court

Why

In April 2006 Leicestershire man Mr Warren Hurst, a contractor working on behalf of LCL Electronics Ltd to install an extraction system at the firm's base on Craftmans Way, was injured when he fell three metres from a ladder and suffered fractures to both of his wrists. On 6 February the company pleaded guilty to contravening Work at Height Regulations 2005 and was fined £1,500 and ordered to pay costs of £5,438.  Leicestershire HSE Principal Inspector John Marshall said:  "Although this was a nasty injury, it could easily have been a lot worse - every year people working at height lose their lives or suffer serious injury, people have been killed or left disabled from shorter falls from this. Employers need to ensure that work is properly planned for. Had the company assessed the work the ladder would have been identified as unsuitable for the task. Companies need to be aware of the risks of working at height and need to ensure that any work carried out has been properly planned - including carrying out a risk assessment.  There are some very simple steps that need to be taken before carrying out any work at height: 1. Plan the work in advance including how you will gain access and how will you prevent falls;  2. Implement the control measures identified in the plan e.g. hire in a cherry picker, protect fragile surfaces; 3. Supervise the work so that the plan is followed and the safety measures are used.  Every job is different and you need to go through these steps every time. These precautions are not new and HSE has produced lots of guidance which is freely available on the website.   "Firms need to ensure they have devised a proper method for doing the job - some employers clearly need to raise their game to stay on the right side of the law."

How Much?

£1,500 plus costs


Who

Dover Building and Property Maintenance

When

5 Feb 2007

Where

Folkestone Magistrates Court

Why

Two partners from a building firm were been fined £10,000 each and ordered to pay £1,290 each in costs at Folkestone Magistrates Court as a result of an incident which left a teenager with a fractured skull and a brain haemorrhage.  Peter Swinbourne and Nicholas Rawlins, who traded jointly as Dover Building and Property Maintenance based at Threeways, Hollands Hill, Martin Mill, Dover, were prosecuted under Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 following the incident which took place in Folkestone Road, Dover on 2nd October 2006.   Martin Sankey, 16, from Dover was working for the company to gain experience while on a college bricklaying course. On his second day he was asked to clear some materials from the second floor of the development, on the site of the former Webbs Hotel.  As Mr Sankey was on the second floor, he blacked out and fell through the hole of a lift well that was under construction. He fell almost 5.9 metres (19 feet) to the ground floor, suffering a fractured skull, a brain haemorrhage, facial and leg injuries and extensive bruising.   If a basic temporary guard had been constructed around the lift well, work could have carried on in the area unhindered as well as protecting workers like Mr Sankey who were passing through the area.  John Underwood, HM Inspector of Health and Safety, said:  "The construction industry continues to have a poor record regarding falls from height, which dominate the accident statistics despite a major effort by the industry and the HSE.  Any weakness in the system of work or controls used to prevent falls can lead to dramatic and life threatening accidents. If those in control fail to insist on a high standard at all times then accidents will continue to occur.  It is particularly ironic that Martin's accident occurred when he became ill and collapsed but both Martin and other workers on the site were equally likely to fall from an unprotected open edge by a slip or a trip.  The level of fine awarded against the partners shows how seriously the Court viewed this failure to look after a completely inexperienced young person but illness at work is probably more likely to involve older workers.  This accident was totally preventable in that a very basic timber or scaffold edge protection barrier would have prevented anyone working near the lift well or moving past it from falling."

How Much?

£20,000 plus costs


Who

LINPAC Materials Handling UK Ltd

When

5 Feb 2007

Where

Aldridge and Walsall Magistrates Court

Why

LINPAC Materials Handling UK Ltd was fined £2,500 and costs of £13,000 at Aldridge and Walsall Magistrates' Court on Monday 5 February after pleading guilty to a breach of Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, for failing to adequately control the risks from legionella at their Walsall site between 5 January and 3 March 2004. Speaking after the case, HSE investigating inspector Angela Gallagher said: "Companies need to be aware that any system containing water at a temperature likely to exceed 20oC and which may release an aerosol during operation or maintenance presents a foreseeable risk of exposure to legionella bacteria. Linpac had neglected to take action to control that risk in their chiller system. They had also failed to prevent unsafe working practices which created exposure to potentially infected aerosols."  During a visit to the Linpac site at Newfield Close, Green Lane, Walsall, HSE inspectors found evidence of poor maintenance of the chiller unit at the factory. There was also a lack of biocide treatment - used to inhibit the growth of legionella - within the unit.

How Much?

£2,500 plus costs


Who

BUPA Care Homes (CFC) Ltd

When

2 Feb 2007

Where

Frome Magistrates Court

Why

The company was prosecuted at Frome Magistrates Courts under Section 3 (1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and Regulation 4 (3) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, following an incident three years ago at the Clare Hall Nursing Home in Stone Easton, Somerset.  The company pleaded guilty to both charges and was fined £18,000 for the Section 3 and £5,000 for the Regulation 4; it was also ordered to pay full costs of £12, 607.60.  HSE conducted a joint investigation with the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) following the death of an 80-year-old resident, Eleanor Newton, at the Somerset care home on 17 April 2004. Mrs Newton was found entrapped in a set of bed rails fitted to her bed and died shortly afterwards. The post mortem on Mrs Newton's death was 'indeterminate' and did not establish a direct link between the entrapment and cause of death.  However, it is evident that Mrs Newton was in a situation of high risk and HSE secured a successful prosecution relating to the company's failure to ensure that BUPA's overall bed rail policy was properly implemented at Clare Hall. This failure resulted in poor risk assessment and awareness of potential risks, inadequate staff training and unsuitable rails being used.  HSE Inspector, Helen Sherwood, who investigated the case, said: "This prosecution should send a clear message to all care home owners about the risks associated with their everyday equipment. Bed rails might look harmless but if they are incorrectly fitted or if unsuitable rails are used or if staff are inadequately trained - particularly in the case of elderly and frail residents - then they could pose a real danger.  I'm pleased to say that Clare Hall and BUPA overall responded very positively to the two enforcement notices served during our joint investigation with CSCI and improvements have already been made. We now want other care homes to be equally responsible - let's not wait for a tragedy to strike before the message gets through."

How Much?

£23,000 plus costs


Who

Just Granite Ltd

When

1 Feb 2007

Where

Stafford Magistrates Court

Why

The case brought by the HSE follows its investigation into the death of 52 year old lorry driver Lubomir Tihlar, who was fatally crushed by granite slabs on 7 November 2005.  Speaking after the case, HSE investigating inspector Peter Yoxall said:  "The death of Mr Tihlar was the tragic result of a failure to take practicable precautions to control the risks associated with the unloading of vehicles that contained granite slabs. Carrying out a risk assessment for workplace transport and making sure that it is practical and effective is sensible health and safety."  Mr Tihlar, a lorry driver from the Czech Republic, was fatally crushed when slabs of granite that weighed in excess of six tonnes fell and trapped him. The accident happened at Just Granite Ltd's site at Pillaton Hall Farm, Pillaton, Penkridge, Stafford.  Just Granite Ltd pleaded guilty to a breach of section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and Regulation 3(1) of the Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999.

How Much?

£10,000 plus costs


 


Copyright Schofield Publishing 2005-2008. www.healthandsafetymonitor.com
| Next